|
Post by habone1677 on Feb 15, 2024 1:35:26 GMT -5
Yes No Yes Changing the size Impossible Possible Impossible Developer APIs Google Stephane.Ly Dimensions affected? No No No Optimization 57% 56% 39% Final weight 178.3 KB 184KB 253 KB Quality The photo quality was not affected by the transformation. However, the weight of the photo is less than half of what it was before compression. You can see that the texture of the flamingo's plumage has remained unchanged and still contains many details. The colors were also not transformed during the optimization. We can conclude that TinyPNG does not interfere with the quality Bulgaria Phone Number List of photos, since the changes made are imperceptible to the naked eye. With Squoosh, the details of the plumage texture are less visible than in the original photo. The head and beak, however, have almost the same quality. Even the colors are the same after the transformation. The advantage of this tool is that it allows you to vary the weight reduction of the image. Compressor.io is the tool that best preserves the quality of the original image. The changes are almost not visible. It retains all the detail and texture of the flamingo's plumage. Image TinyPNG Image Squoosh Image Compressor.io In conclusion… Each tool was able to significantly reduce the weight of the original image. TinyPNG and Squoosh achieved an optimization of more than 55% and Compressor.io a little less, 39%. All images retained their quality and colors, and while Compressor stands out on this score, Squoosh performed well as well.
|
|